Friday, April 17, 2026

Professor R. Narasimhan: Birth Centenary

 

                  Painting created by MS Copilot using a Photograph of RN I had taken 

Professor R. Narasimhan: Birth Centenary

Much has been written about Professor R. Narasimhan (RN) — computer pioneer, institution builder, and one of the sharpest minds of his generation. Anyone looking for dates, milestones, and achievements will find the Wikipedia article useful. His book, “Artificial Intelligence and the study of Agentive Behaviour” contains selected papers he had published.

This piece is not about that RN!

This is about the RN I knew as a person — my mentor, my PhD co‑guide (along with Professor J. R. Isaac), and a remarkable human being whose influence shaped my early academic life.


Lunches, Conversations, and a Curious Mind

RN was a true gentleman, and a natural magnet for researchers from wildly different fields. Most afternoons, you could find him in the TIFR West Canteen, talking to computer scientists and biologists, and an occasional psychologist, radio astronomer, or nuclear engineer at a six-seater table. I was lucky to be part of that circle.

These were not casual lunch-table chats. RN was deeply fascinated by cognitive psychology and brain sciences. He believed — long before it became fashionable — that artificial intelligence must learn from animal and human behaviour and the functioning of the brain.

Because of this, our table had biologists more often than physicists. Many of them were studying C. elegans, the tiny millimetre-long worm with just 302 neurons that still manages to learn and remember. RN loved that fact. It fit perfectly with his conviction that understanding simple biological systems could illuminate the future of AI.

My friend Ramesh Sinha from Radio Astronomy would join us sometimes. And occasionally, M. R. Srinivasan — founder-chairman of the Nuclear Power Corporation — would walk from his office across the street and sit with us. He was RN’s friend.


Bananas, Cheese, and a Life of Simplicity

RN had a small ritual at the end of lunch. He would buy two bananas and a cube of cheese from the canteen, wrap them carefully in paper napkins, and take them home. That was his dinner.

There was something touching about that simplicity. “High thinking, modest living” was not a slogan for him — it was his way of life.


NCST Days and Guest House Stories

Later, when many of us from the TIFR Computer Group moved out to create the National Centre for Software Technology (NCST), RN became a key member of our Governing Council. After retiring from TIFR, he moved to Bangalore but continued to visit NCST and stay in our guest house.

The guest house had two rooms. On rare occasions, RN had to share it with another Governing Council member — an eminent computer scientist I will call Prof 2.

I lived on the same floor, so I often heard the stories.

RN had a strong dislike for house lizards. If he spotted one, he would immediately call the building watchman to come and chase it out. The guest house had a common bathroom, and Prof 2 once told me that RN politely asked if he could take his shower first. “I don’t like a wet bathroom,” he said.

These small moments captured the man perfectly — brilliant, disciplined, gentle, and quietly particular about the things that mattered to him.


Looking Back from Today’s AI World

When I think back to those lunches and conversations about brains, behaviour, memory, and learning, I feel a quiet pride. RN’s focus and judgement were decades ahead of its time.

Today’s AI revolution is based on artificial neural networks — ideas that echo the very biological inspirations RN had urged us to pay attention to.


Srinivasan Ramani
April 17, 2026

P.S.: I had written the first version of this article but had asked MS Copilot if it would help in improving the long sentences and passive sentences. Copilot did that but had the gumption to go further and offer to create a “polished, blog‑ready, informal version of my article — warm, readable, and faithful to my voice”. It offered to keep it “conversational, reflective, and lightly narrative, the way a personal centenary tribute should feel”.

I said “go ahead. Here is my article,” and gave it the text of my article. What you see above is the version Copilot produced! Then, I asked it to produce a painting-like image from a photograph of RN. I had that image two minutes later! I have reproduced it above.

I wish RN were here to see the levels AI has reached!

 


Friday, April 10, 2026

AI is the surest way to global catastrophe humanity has so far invented!

 

                            This image was created as per my description by Microsoft Copilot on April 10, 2026

From Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2026). Building a human resilience infrastructure for the AI age. Imagining the Digital Future Center, Elon University. Pages 67-68

‘AI is the surest way to a global catastrophe humanity has so far invented. ... Can we create a new movement for moral and ethical considerations before the AI hurricane destroys half of humanity?’

Srinivasan Ramani, an Internet Hall of Fame member, previously research director at HP Labs India and professor at the International Institute of Information Technology in Bangalore, wrote: “I confess to being an AI aficionado – I have been one since 1964. My education and research experience make me a critical observer, not a blind fan. I have been a daily user of the Microsoft Copilot for more than a year. It applies semantic dimensions to understand what a user is talking about and has the fluency to make occasional flattering remarks, showing off a form of personality! Its access to resources encompassing a vast swath of human knowledge – including history, science, arts, medicine and technology – makes it a powerful collaborator at work. Its problem-solving abilities include the capability to implement all published algorithms, heuristics and approximate methods while also staying aware of even today’s news. Copilot can now do the bulk of the routine work that researchers and writers do. It surely has increased my productivity and helped me troubleshoot problems in my daily life.

However, I believe that AI is the surest way to global catastrophe that humanity has invented to this point. We are not a mature society globally, and yet we have acquired extremely dangerous weapons. When people are running away from a city under bombing, rarely do they think of their neighbours. So, I doubt that humanity can come together to agree on effective international cooperation against malevolent AI.”

‘I have hopes that a new movement could create a new morality to help us confront the challenges. ... The rarity or uniqueness of anything like the human civilization in all the observable universe could inspire many people to join the proposed movement. Humanity would be most un-intelligent if it creates such a unique civilization and then fails to save it from destruction.‘

“We have no warning system for specific dangers and we have no treaties like the ones that confronted mutually assured destruction by nuclear weapons in the late 20th Century. Safeguards and treaties against runaway AI may come in 10 years, but that may be too late.

Innovative technologies for use in intercontinental navigation in the 15th century onward made popular scientific theories such as the Copernican Heliocentric theory and threatened formal religion. We should not underestimate a similar threat to religious beliefs being the result of developments in AI.

The biggest threat is to our economic and social structures.

The concept of jobs as the mechanism for providing an income and survival is under threat. The mechanism of taxing individuals’ income to provide the bulk of government expenditure is also under threat. Do all human beings have an inherent right to incomes irrespective of their employment? Does this right cover all regions of the Earth, or is it confined to residents of economically advanced nations? This question threatens our political foundations.

Traditional pedagogies force students to learn a lot of information and knowledge just in case they may need it during their lives. AI has trashed these pedagogies, by giving information and knowledge on demand. The pace of change in most fields of human endeavour make it meaningless to restrict learning to the first quarter of one’s life. New pedagogies need to be evolved to teach all people to live in a turbocharged world in which they must learn to change and adapt all their lives.”

“I think like an engineer, clinging to hope at the worst of times. I will be thinking of solutions to problems till my last breath. So, let me describe my hopes.

The power of compounded earnings makes me believe that poverty may not be as big a threat as it has been in the past. The problem is a moral one. Do most people recognize that the speed of social and economic change is already extremely high? Can we create a new movement for moral and ethical considerations before the AI hurricane destroys half of humanity?

I have hopes that a new movement could create a new morality to help us confront the challenges. I take hope from the green parties which have had a degree of success in earning public support to face the threat to sustainability of human life on Earth. The rarity or uniqueness of anything like the human civilization in all the observable universe could inspire many people to join the proposed movement.

Humanity would be most un-intelligent if it creates such a unique civilization and then fails to save it from destruction.”

Srinivasan Ramani
Retd. Professor, IIIT Bangalore